Key takeaways
- Most AI visibility tools priced between $29 and $99 a month are prompt trackers. They tell you whether your brand was mentioned, and not much else.
- The $200-$250 band is where the gap opens up. Promptwatch Professional at $245/mo is the one plan we found at that price that adds content generation, a knowledge base, crawler analytics, and 150 prompts across all models.
- Entry plans often cap you hard: Profound's $99 Starter tracks ChatGPT only, and Semrush's $99 toolkit covers 25 prompts on one domain.
- Pricing in this category is messy and changes often. Third-party listicles disagree with each other, so confirm every number on the vendor's pricing page before buying.
- Pick based on what you will do after the report lands. If nobody has time to fix gaps, buy a tool that helps fix them.
Why the $250 line matters
I picked $250 a month because it is roughly where a single marketer or a small team can expense a tool without a procurement conversation. Below it, the market is crowded. Above it, you start meeting enterprise sales calls and custom quotes.
The problem is that "AI visibility platform" covers very different products. Some are a spreadsheet that runs 25 prompts for you. Others try to cover the whole loop: see where you are missing, work out why, make the content, publish it, and check whether it got cited.
A few market facts help frame the choice. Promptwatch Data's average sources per response report (based on web-search-triggered responses) found ChatGPT cites about 5 sources per answer, Google AI Overviews about 10, and Perplexity almost exactly 10 every day. Citation slots are scarce in ChatGPT and a bit more available elsewhere, so a tool that only counts mentions leaves you guessing about what to change.
What you should expect at each price band
Based on the third-party roundups I pulled (KIME, Otterly, Nathan Ojaokomo, Business.com, Techiehub) plus vendor pages, the market breaks down roughly like this. Treat the numbers as directional. Several of those roundups are written by vendors, and they conflict with each other.
| Price band | Typical product | What you usually get | What is usually missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50/mo | Light trackers (Otterly from about $29, Rankscale about $20, HubSpot AEO from $50) | A handful of prompts, basic mention tracking | Crawler data, content tools, depth |
| $50-$100/mo | Entry plans from Peec, Profound, Semrush, Rankshift, LLMrefs, Nightwatch | 25-50 prompts, a few models, dashboards | Optimization workflow, often multiple engines |
| $100-$250/mo | Mid-tier plans | More prompts, more models, sometimes content or audit tools | Varies a lot, check carefully |
| $250+/mo | Scrunch, Profound upper tiers, enterprise suites | Deeper reporting, support, seats | Cost |
If you want to browse beyond what I cover here, the GEO software directory at bestgeosoftware.com and the AI rank tracking directory list far more options.
What "full-featured" should mean at this price
I would call a platform full-featured if it clears most of these:
- Tracks the real interfaces of several engines (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot), not just one
- Gives you 100+ prompts so you can cover more than your brand name
- Shows which pages and domains get cited, and where competitors win
- Has some way to see whether AI crawlers can actually read your site
- Helps you create or refresh content against the gaps it finds
- Exports data or connects to your stack (API, Search Console, Slack)
That list rules out most of the sub-$100 tier. It is not a criticism of those tools, since plenty of teams only need a scoreboard.
The platforms worth comparing
Promptwatch
Promptwatch is the one I would put first if the goal is to act on the data, not just watch it. Its Essential plan is $95/mo (50 prompts, 6,000 responses, all models, Agent Chat, country tracking, 360 Insights, content gap analysis, MCP and API). Professional is $245/mo, just under the cap: 2 projects, 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, 1,500 Agent Credits, 5 AEO articles, a Knowledge Base, 1M visitor events, 25M crawler logs, custom reports and a Looker Studio connector.

What makes it different at this price is the crawler and traffic layer. IP-verified AI crawler logs show whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and others reach your pages and hit errors. Visitor analytics attach real traffic and conversions to AI platforms. Then the content tools (gap analysis, Content Creation, Content Refresh) turn gaps into drafts. Most prompt trackers stop before any of that.
Honest caveats: the automated Content Agent, local GEO targeting at exact coordinates, Shopping Insights and Ads Radar are on Business ($579/mo), which is over the cap. Prices are also shown in USD with a euro toggle, and annual billing gives 12 months for the price of 10, so check which one you are looking at. There is a 7-day free trial on monthly Essential and Professional. Confirm everything at promptwatch.com/pricing.
Peec AI
Peec is a clean monitoring tool aimed at mid-market teams and European agencies. Listicles quote its Starter plan at about $80/mo (annual) or roughly $95/mo, with around 50 prompts and 3 models. That conflict is exactly why you verify.
It is good at what it does: broad platform coverage and competitive analytics. The limit, as one reviewer put it, is that it offers limited guidance on what to fix. Fine if you have an SEO team that already knows what to do with the data.
Profound
Profound is built for mid-market and enterprise AEO teams. KIME reports a Starter plan at $99/mo (billed yearly, 50 prompts, one seat) that tracks ChatGPT only. That is a very narrow view when AI Overviews and Perplexity cite differently.
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
At $99/mo per domain billed annually for 25 custom prompts, it is the path of least resistance if Semrush is already your reporting tool. Twenty-five prompts is thin, though, so I would treat it as an add-on rather than a main platform.
Otterly.AI
Otterly is the budget option, quoted from $29/mo. Good for a first look at whether you show up at all.

Rankshift, LLMrefs, and Nightwatch
These three cluster around $79-$92/mo. Rankshift starts at $92 monthly ($82 annual). LLMrefs lists $79/mo with roughly 500 prompts across supported engines, which is a lot of volume for the money. Nightwatch starts around $79 with tiers based on tracking volume and suits teams that already track Google rankings.

Scrunch
Reviews place Scrunch from about $250/mo depending on requirements, so it sits right at the cap and often above it. Worth a demo if you need enterprise-style reporting.
Writesonic GEO
Otterly's roundup lists Writesonic GEO from $49/mo as a visibility tracker with an AI writer in one product, covering ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. That coverage is narrower than the all-model plans above, but it is an inexpensive way to combine tracking with drafting.

Side-by-side comparison
| Tool | Quoted entry price | Prompts / coverage at entry | Crawler data | Content tools | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promptwatch Essential | $95/mo | 50 prompts, all models | Via higher plans and Agent Analytics | Gap analysis | Teams that want to act |
| Promptwatch Professional | $245/mo | 150 prompts, all models | Yes (25M logs) | Writing, refresh, Knowledge Base | Full loop under $250 |
| Peec AI | about $80-$95/mo | 50 prompts, 3 models | No | No | Monitoring for agencies |
| Profound Starter | $99/mo | 50 prompts, ChatGPT only | Not at this tier | No | Upgrade path to enterprise |
| Semrush AI Toolkit | $99/mo per domain | 25 prompts | No | Via Semrush suite | Existing Semrush users |
| LLMrefs | $79/mo | about 500 prompts | No | No | High-volume tracking |
| Rankshift | $82-$92/mo | Starter | No | No | Citation tracking |
| Otterly.AI | from $29/mo | Basic | No | No | Cheapest start |
| Writesonic GEO | from $49/mo | 3 engines | No | AI writer | Tracking plus drafting |
Crawler and content columns reflect what vendors and roundups state, not hands-on testing of every plan. Check each pricing page.
How to choose
If you only need a scoreboard
Pick the cheapest tracker that covers your main engines. Otterly, LLMrefs or Peec will do. Spend the savings on content.
If you need to fix things
Then the question is whether the tool tells you why you are invisible. Crawler logs matter more than people expect: if GPTBot is getting 403 errors, no amount of new content helps. Promptwatch's AI crawler traffic data shows how much verified crawler activity different AI companies generate, and Promptwatch Data's Meta-WebIndexer report shows how fast that mix can change (about 2% to nearly 38% of tracked requests between mid-July and August 9, 2026).
If you are tracking prompts that fan out
ChatGPT does not run a single query per prompt. Promptwatch Data's query fanout report shows averages between about 1.0 and 2.15 searches per response across December 2025 to April 2026, and its site: operator report found the site: operator jumping from about 0.4% to about 17% of fanout queries on August 8, 2026. A tool that shows fan-outs is more useful than one that only logs final answers.
If you work for an agency
Per-project pricing matters more than prompt count. Promptwatch's agency plans start at $199/mo (Kick-off) with unlimited projects, though they leave out the Content Agent and AEO articles. Slate and similar agency-focused tools are worth a look too.
A quick buying checklist
- Write down the 30 to 50 prompts you actually care about, then count how many each plan allows.
- Check which engines are included at the tier you are paying for. "All models" and "ChatGPT only" are very different.
- Ask whether data comes from real interfaces or APIs. User-facing answers often differ.
- Confirm annual vs monthly pricing. Annual discounts of around 17% are common.
- Use the free trial, run your real prompts, and see if the output tells you what to do next.

The KIME roundup above is useful for its pricing grid, but remember it is vendor-written and ranks its own product first.
Where the mid-tier is heading
The pattern I notice is that monitoring is becoming a commodity. A $29 tool and a $245 tool can both tell you that you were mentioned in 4 of 50 prompts. The difference is what happens next. If you are a team of one or two, I would take 150 prompts plus crawler logs plus a content workflow over 500 prompts and a dashboard.
If you would rather hand strategy to people, an agency like 1001 SEO Media pairs technical SEO and GEO work with a platform subscription, but that is a separate decision from buying software.
Before you pay for anything, run a free check. Promptwatch's free AI Visibility Report scans how ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity describe your brand without a login, which gives you a baseline to compare any paid tool against.




