Mentionable Review 2026
Mentionable monitors AI visibility daily across eight LLMs without credit-based pricing, covering real-time visibility tracking, sentiment analysis and competitor benchmarking. White-label features make it workable for agencies managing multiple client brands.
Key takeaways
- Mentionable is one of the cheapest ways to get daily AI visibility tracking. Monitoring runs across all engines without burning credits, from €79/month. Most direct rivals charge two to three times that.
- Its best idea is the gap-to-draft loop: it finds prompts where no engine cites you, reads the pages they cite instead, and drafts your version. You still publish by hand, though, and drafts consume credits.
- Next to Promptwatch, it's missing AI crawler logs, native AI traffic attribution (GA4 estimates only), prompt volume and difficulty data, ChatGPT Shopping tracking, YouTube citation tracking, and automated CMS publishing.
- It's a solo-founder product launched in January 2026 with roughly 50-70 brands and a single G2 review. Functional, genuinely useful, young. Agencies building a client offer on top of it should weigh the bus factor.
- Best for solopreneurs, small SaaS teams, and boutique European agencies that want simple daily tracking plus a nudge on what to write next.
What Mentionable actually does
The core loop is simple, and I mean that as a compliment. You enter your URL, Mentionable generates a set of market prompts, you pick the ones worth tracking, and from there it scans on its own. Refresh rate is configurable per project, daily or three times a week, and every scan checks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews cite you.
Where it gets interesting is the layer underneath the answers. Before an AI responds to "best CRM for startups," it runs dozens of follow-up questions nobody sees. Mentionable captures these fan-out queries and shows you the real topic map you need to exist on. That's the same insight Promptwatch sells as query fan-outs, and it's the right one. Ranking for the head prompt means little if the model's internal sub-questions all point at a competitor.
Then there's the competitive view: share of voice per prompt, per competitor, per engine. If HubSpot takes 38% of recommendations on a prompt and you take 11%, that's readable in a way a raw mention count never is. Source tracking rounds it out. Mentionable logs every domain cited in your niche, then goes one step further and attaches an impact score and an estimated market price to backlink opportunities. I have mixed feelings about that last part. A shortlist of domains that actually lift AI visibility is useful. Putting a euro figure next to each one edges toward "buy your way in" thinking, and relevance isn't always purchasable.
The credit question, answered honestly
The tagline says "credit-free daily GEO tracking," and that's accurate but incomplete. Daily monitoring doesn't consume credits. Page audits, Reddit engagement, and AI page generation do. Growth includes 1,500 scan credits a month, Pro 3,000, Agency 5,000, with pay-as-you-grow overage at €0.02 per scan via Stripe metered billing and a spend cap you set yourself.
So the honest framing: tracking is unmetered within your prompt count, the extras are metered. If your plan is "monitor daily, draft one page a week," the credits stretch fine. If you expect to generate content at volume, you'll be watching a meter.
Pricing overall: Growth at €79/month for one project and up to 115 prompts, Pro at €149 for three projects and 231 prompts, Agency at €299 for unlimited client projects, 385 prompts, white-label reports and shareable client audits. All prices exclude tax. There's a 4-day trial with no credit card, no permanent free plan, and a small set of free tools (a visibility check, a GEO audit, an llms.txt generator) plus a 74-lesson GEO course that used to be paid. For a bootstrapped product, giving the course away was smart. It costs the founder little and it trains his future customers.
What works
The gap-to-draft loop is the feature I'd point to. For every prompt the engines answer without mentioning you, Mentionable reads the pages they cite instead and drafts yours in the same format: structure, copy, markup. Numbers only you would know get flagged for you to fill in. You publish it, paste the live URL back, and from the next scan it watches for the citation. It's a closed feedback loop, which most trackers don't even attempt.
White-label on the Agency plan is real, not a checkbox. Unlimited team members on every plan is generous. MCP integration on Pro and Agency lets you plug the data into your own AI workflows, and GA4 connects for traffic. The free course and the manually verified agency directory give it an ecosystem feel that products this size usually lack.
Where it falls short
Now the gaps, and they matter, because this category has moved fast.
No crawler logs. You cannot see whether ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot actually visited the page you published, what they read, or what errors they hit. Promptwatch logs 400+ crawlers with a crawl-to-citation path per page. Without that, when your published draft doesn't get picked up, you're guessing. Was it crawlability, content quality, or timing? Mentionable can't tell you.
Traffic attribution is an estimate. The GA4 integration is welcome, but it can't observe no-click recommendations, and there's no native analytics of actual AI-platform visitors and conversions. Promptwatch tracks real traffic from AI platforms to your site. For a tool whose own FAQ argues that a ChatGPT recommendation doesn't show up in Google Analytics, leaning on GA4 for the traffic piece is a bit of a shrug.
No prompt volumes or difficulty scores. You know you're invisible on a prompt, but not whether anyone asks it. Promptwatch attaches monthly volume, difficulty, and citation rate per prompt, so you can prioritize by demand. Mentionable ranks gaps by how many engines ignore you, which is a decent proxy but blind to how many people actually ask.
Other missing pieces: no ChatGPT Shopping or sponsored-placement tracking, no YouTube citation tracking (Reddit engagement exists but is credit-based), no offsite mention detection, no CMS publishing. That last one is the practical difference between a drafting assistant and an optimization platform. Promptwatch's Content Agents plan, write, and publish to Webflow, Framer or WordPress on a schedule you control. Mentionable hands you a draft and you copy-paste it. Fine for one site. Tedious across ten client projects.
Scale and maturity. Mentionable runs about 130K prompts a month and lists 70+ brands, up from roughly 50 in mid-2026. Promptwatch has analyzed more than 4.5 billion citations, clicks and prompts, adds 100M+ data points daily, and serves 1,840+ brands and agencies with a 4.7/5 G2 rating. Mentionable has one G2 review, incentivized, from June 2026. Salesdorado's detailed review scored it 4.2/5 overall but 3.7 on maturity, and the product's own site can't decide whether it covers seven or eight engines: the pricing page says seven, the comparison pages and G2 profile say eight, with Grok as the recent addition. Small thing. It tells you the marketing site evolves slower than the product, which is a very solo-founder problem to have.
And that's the real caveat. Alexandre Rastello built this alone, bootstrapped, launched mid-January 2026. That's impressive. It also means the roadmap and the support queue depend on one person. If you're a consultant tracking your own brand, that's acceptable risk. If you're an agency selling white-label GEO to paying clients on top of this stack, think about it.
Who it's for
The fit is narrow but real. Solopreneurs and small SaaS marketing teams who want daily visibility tracking without credit anxiety and without a €200+ bill. Boutique agencies, mostly European so far (Developr, ID Interactive and OmniaRank are named users), that want client-ready audits and white-label reports at €299/month. Anyone who wants to learn GEO properly before spending real money, thanks to the free course.
If you're an enterprise brand, a 20-client agency, or anyone who needs to know why a page isn't getting cited rather than just that it isn't, this will feel thin.
Bottom line
Mentionable is a promising budget tracker with one genuinely good idea, the gap-to-draft loop, and a price that undercuts almost everyone. I'd call it a monitoring tool with a drafting assist rather than an optimization platform. For teams that want the full picture, crawler logs that explain the why, native AI traffic attribution, prompt volumes for prioritization, Reddit and YouTube tracking, ChatGPT Shopping insights, and agents that write and publish straight to your CMS, Promptwatch is the stronger choice and worth the price difference. Mentionable is the sensible pick if daily tracking is genuinely all you need and €79 is your ceiling.
Tags:
Frequently asked questions
What is Mentionable?
How often does Mentionable track AI visibility?
Which LLMs does Mentionable monitor?
Who is Mentionable designed for?
Does Mentionable use credit-based pricing?
How much does Mentionable cost?
Does Mentionable include sentiment analysis?
Can Mentionable benchmark my brand against competitors?
Does Mentionable offer white-label reporting for agencies?
How does Mentionable compare to other AI visibility monitoring tools?
Is Mentionable free?
What is GEO tracking?
Similar and alternative tools to Mentionable
